Kalām Cosmological Argument

It has come to my attention that the version of the cosmological argument I use in my previous refutation located here, is not the version many apologetics use and thus, with new thoughts in mind I will refute the basic yet famous four point Kalām Cosmological Argument (henceforth known as “the KCA”) laid out by Dr. William Lane Craig.
The KCA goes as follows:

  1. Whatever begins to exist has a cause.
  2. The universe began to exist.
  3. Therefore, the universe has a cause.
  4. This cause is the God of Classical Theism, and is a personal being, because He chose to create the universe.

(there are a few subsets and I will refute those as well but first I must hit the main points)

Point 1: This first point is used as a starting to place with which to make a logical inference about our universe. What is said is, “whatever begins to exist has a cause” but this fails for a few reasons. First off, all the things we see “beginning to exist” are actually reconstructions of preexisting material thus they are not creation events in the sense of the universe. According the the common big bang model, (we will ignore multiverse models because those shatter this argument for a whole host of other reasons) there was no preexisting material from which the universe could be created, it was true creatio ex nihilo. Our day to day experiences of “creating” things cannot be applied to the universe because those are creations from existing materials whereas the universe was not created from any preexisting materials.

Second off, we actually can witness creatio ex nihilo in our universe. We witness creation of particles from nothing on the quantum realm.* These are basically equal to the creation event that occurred during the big bang and guess what? Quantum fluctuations are uncaused!** Victor Stenger says that there are “Uncaused, random quantum fluctuations…”[1], Richard Morris says, “…the idea of a First Cause sounds somewhat fishy in light of the modern theory of quantum mechanics. According to the most commonly accepted interpretation of quantum mechanics, individual subatomic particles can behave in unpredictable ways and there are numerous random, uncaused events.”[2] and as Paul Davies says, “energy can appear and disappear out of nowhere in a spontaneous and unpredictable fashion.”[2]
These quotes show that with creation events on par with that of the big bang, a first cause is not required thus shattering premise 1.

Point 2: This point seems rather intuitive but it may not be so.  We do not have a full theory of quantum gravity thus we cannot say for certain what happened in the big bang singularity nor can we say with certainty that it was in fact, the beginning. For example, loop quantum gravity, a competing theory to String Theory and M-Theory, posits that space-time itself is quantized thus meaning there would be no big bang singularity as we know it, it would be the collapse of another universe that would then expand. Granted, this may not get rid of the first cause argument but it is an interesting thing to ponder.[3] There is also a model of the universe put forward by Wun-Yi Shu which has says that the universe had no big bang, no beginning and no end.[4] Of course these are all speculative but it doesn’t rule out the possibility of a timeless universe.

Point 3: Point 3 falls under the refutations of points 1 and 2.

Point 4: Point 4 falls, is insane and contradicts the claim that there was nothing before the big bang because it says that god “chose” to create the universe which means a change from one state to another thus meaning that
a)God is not immutable since he changed from one state to another and
b)There was time “before” the big bang since time is required for change to occur.

Now I shall move on to the sub-points.
The first of which goes like this:

  1. An actual infinite cannot exist.
  2. An infinite temporal regress of events is an actual infinite.
  3. Therefore, an infinite temporal regress of events cannot exist.

To refute this point I only need to refute point one which I shall do now.

Point 1: To prove that this is false I will use two definitions both of singularities.
1: “A gravitational singularity or spacetime singularity is a location where the quantities that are used to
measure the gravitational field become infinite in a way that does not depend on the coordinate system.
These quantities are the scalar invariant curvatures of spacetime, which includes a measure of the
density of matter.”[5]
2: “A point at which a function takes an infinite value, esp. in space-time when matter is infinitely dense, as
at the center of a black hole”[6]

It seems that Dr. Craig is a couple decades behind modern physics.

Points 2 and 3: Both of these fall because they are predicated on the false idea that “actual” infinites cannot exist. *FUN FACT: Dr. Craig concedes that a singularity is an infinity! See foot note [7]*

The second sub-point goes like this:

  1. A collection formed by successive addition cannot be an actual infinite.
  2. The temporal series of past events is a collection formed by successive addition.
  3. Therefore, the temporal series of past events cannot be actually infinite.

This one I don’t have a straight forward refutation to but I am curious as to why Dr. Craig thinks premise 1 is true. If the successive addition did not stop, then, by definition, it would be an infinity, an infinite regress.

Conclusion: I find the KCA quite unconvincing for the reasons I outlined above as well as the fact that, according to Vilenkin, the universe tunneled out of “literally nothing”. I leave you with the thesis of Vilenkin’s paper.

“A cosmological model is proposed in which the universe is created by quantum tunneling from literally nothing into a de Sitter space. After the tunneling, the model evolves along the lines of the inflationary scenario. This model does not have a big-bang singularity and does not require any initial or boundary conditions.”[8]

~~Peter

————————————————————————————————————-

*it must be noted that this point is often contested by theists because they will say that the vacuum of space is not nothing but it really is. It is merely the lowest energy state of nothing allowed by the laws of quantum mechanics.

**here is another point of debate and even if one says they are caused, they are not caused by anything in particular, merely uncertainties in the energy of the vacuum.

For your watching pleasure: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=baZUCc5m8sE
and: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KQ–CbV7L-g&feature=channel_video_title
and: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_676IeyJNQ
1: Vuletic, M. (n.d.). Creation ex nihilo – without God. Secular Web: Atheism, Agnosticism, Naturalism, Skepticism and Secularism. Retrieved August 22, 2011, from <http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/mark_vuletic/vacuum.html>
2: Braungardt, J. (n.d.). Vacuum Fluctuations. Jürgen Braungardt. Retrieved August 22, 2011, from <http://www.braungardt.com/Physics/Vacuum%20Fluctuation.htm>
3: Bojowald, M. (n.d.). Big Bang or Big Bounce?: New Theory on the Universe’s Birth – Scientific American – RichardDawkins.net . – RichardDawkins.net . Retrieved August 22, 2011, from <http://richarddawkins.net/articles/3220-big-bang-or-big-bounce-new-theory-on-the-universe-39-s-birth>
4: Zyga, L. (n.d.). Model describes universe with no big bang, no beginning, and no end. PhysOrg.com – Science News, Technology, Physics, Nanotechnology, Space Science, Earth Science, Medicine. Retrieved August 22, 2011, from <http://www.physorg.com/news199591806.html>
5: Gravitational singularity – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. (n.d.).Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Retrieved August 22, 2011, from <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity>
6: define sngularity – Google Search. (n.d.). Google. Retrieved August 22, 2011, from <http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=define+sngularity#hl=en&safe=off&q=singularity&tbs=dfn:1&tbo=u&sa=X&ei=QwtTTsvZKYfagAeZ1sgw&ved=0CBkQkQ4&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.&fp=b95580e7ebe1d466&biw=1366&bih=667>
7: See 4:00 for Craig explaining a singularity himself! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=baZUCc5m8sE
8: Vilenkin, A. (n.d.). Creation of Universes From Nothing.mukto-mona.com. Retrieved August 11, 1922, from <http://www.mukto-mona.com/science/physics/a_vilinkin/universe_from_nothing.pdf>

16 comments

  1. I don’t know why, but for some reason the segments are out of order as well. The order is “Hey Peter” – “Second off” – “The second sub point”.

  2. Actually some theistic relions support for the multiuniverse theory like most hinduismand the similar ones to it.

  3. That last item will be your special personalized gift that is irreplaceable.
    Then take white paint and make stitch marks along the edge (little dashes
    along the edge) If you wanted you can outline the heart in black as
    well. I have many such items on the front of my fridge
    and I have always struggled with powerful magnets that didn’t take up too much space.

    Here is my blog post :: coupon gift ideas

  4. If you visit the teeth doctor, he or she will deep
    clean the pockets of bacteria that are leading to the sore gum area
    and oral cavaties. 15. Three people have been killed and nine injured in protest, the source said, angry demonstrators
    burned down a police station.

    Feel free to visit my weblog; automatic toothbrush for kids

  5. The razor battery is automatically charged although in the Clean & Renew.

    one of the biggest drawbacks of electronic razors is the fact that people
    feel that they do not give a smooth shave that only a traditional open one can provide.
    Male pubic hair removal for men is becoming more and more popular these days.

    My weblog: http://kartingtube.com

  6. I remember feeling phenomenally energized that day.

    Magnesium and calcium also provide the horrible practice of departing
    residue inside the home appliances. I think I like that plan, except,
    here is the next dilemma, I also need to find storage
    for my vacuum, steamer and mops and brooms.

    my web blog :: http://mostefficientspaceheaterreviews.com

  7. Should you be looking for one waffle maker that is effective great and give
    you excellent tasting waffles, a Black and Decker waffle maker is best
    for you. To let mother get on with other tasks in your kitchen, the
    device provides a countdown timer by having an easily readable digital display.
    Molasses Cookie Waffles (so named due to the
    spices and molasses in the ingredients): Approx.

    Look at my page – black n decker Waffle irons
    my website > northsydneydive.com.au

  8. Yeeeaahhh. In fact the term zombie came from the region
    and refers to persons who have undergone such a mind altering experience.
    Along the various groups of survivors the doctor manages to outlive, he
    finds that the infection may have been started by a food processing plant and an additive that
    is found in nearly every food and beverage.

    my weblog; http://techwik.org

  9. It also incorporates some other technologies including a triple
    action cutting system and Active – Lift technology
    which work along with Braun’s Pulsonic technology
    to give a very close and comfortable shave.
    Advantage #3: Innovative Technology = Better Mobility.
    So, search for this whilst choosing one.

    my web blog … best wet electric shaver for men

  10. Energy efficiency is enhanced as the slow cooker cooks
    at a very low wattage (as low as 40 Watts) and the long cooking process will tenderise even the cheapest cuts of meat.

    One great tip for serving up your punch for the holidays is to freeze
    some punch ice cubes ahead of time. In a lot of cases, the best types of meat to
    make use of in slow cooking are often the
    less costly cuts because the greater fat content means that the meat
    becomes beautifully tender throughout the duration of cooking.

    Feel free to visit my website :: juliannaguill.com

  11. While gasoline driven engines were once more popular,
    today more and more models are coming with diesel fuelled engines, which are more
    efficient and less expensive to operate that the gas powered ones.
    And there is the use of the first drill, which is just consisted of a ring of the
    practitioner. For this vehicle, two new exterior colors can be obtained:
    pewter clearcoat metallic, and dark copper clearcoat metallic.

    My website … proforce air Compressor

  12. Honey: Honey is the best natural skincare product that helps keep the skin soft and supple.
    The allergens in these compounds could be bad for people with sensitive skin, and some believe that long term exposure may be linked to certain cancers,
    like those of the breast. Children’s skin is very sensitive and vulnerable, that’s why it requires for a special baby
    skin care.

    Here is my web blog ewinslow.com

  13. This is not ‘armchair’ philosophy, this is armchair stupidity at best, from someone who never studied physics in depth.

    This refutation is complete nonsense. I am a theoretical physicist, with specialization in physical cosmology so do not bullshit me. First and foremost, Vilenkin’s refutation is based completely upon the WDW quantum gravity metric, which by default would fail Villenkin’s argument as it completely and utterly excludes a workable time vector within any QFT or any riemannian vector field, therefore if quantum tunneling was to be even successful IT MUST contain a symmetrical time like vector killing field. Victor Stenger makes the exact same mistake.

    Read Christopher Isham’s work for the more technical refutations of the apparent ‘refutation’ of the cosmological argument

    In my opinion, as a professional physical and quantum cosmologist, Craig’s arguments survives.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.